|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Sep 06, 2008 4:14 am |
|
What makes a Master? |
Ashok Nayak
| |
Friends, i think now it need to intervine by a trained expert like me to this valuable discussion
Summery by Amit and my opinion
1)The Master must have something in him
Ashok: Friends, we are here at a global platform and if any artist even make an entry to such consideration, there must be something on him/her, unless he/she will remain un noticed.
2) That something must be such that it pulls at the heart strings of the multitude so they are able to recognize him/her as such.
Ashok: Yes that something is only to pull heart strings towards artist, but it'll never make him/her an master. Master is a complete package , anything master will pick, it'll surprise everybody with its result.And it will only be happen after a period of regular recognition.
3)There may be someone who showcases that something in him to the multitude.
Ashok:Yes initially it needed, but after he/she proves, autometically it goes to multitude.Remember, Art Collectors has a traditional habit to search these new masters.
And finally, there always money and power makes difference in society, so art can not stay out of it, one has to be very very selective and narrative to join others , unless remeber it's an intelectual group, can manupulate anything with a proper logic.
Will come back
ASHOK NAYAK
http://www.ashokartgallery.comPrivate Reply to Ashok Nayak (new win) |
|
| |
|
