|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Sep 05, 2008 6:06 pm |
|
re: re: re: re: What makes a Master? |
| Preety Kaur
| |
Recognition is also by people like me and you, recognition starts with one, then second person comes and joins the first, and more follow, so it becomes public recognition. When many show interest in someone (for different reasons), some others do not find any risk in showing confidence, hence the theory of recognition is applied. There are many so called masters with public recognition whom work is nothing but piece of junk. And believe it or not, there are may be masters without public knowledge. Also, quality matters, not quantity. How many works of Leonardo we have, only 25-30 total, but there is not a single question of doubt about his genius. Also, Fetching high prices in auction does not necessarily make one a master. There are many good and bad factors behind all this. All comments are welcome, there is no fight, it is a good discussion and I see many good logics coming out it. Have a nice weekend !! Private Reply to Preety Kaur (new win) |
|
| |
|
